Head-to-head comparison

Whey Protein Hydrolysate (WPH) vs Chicken Breast (skinless): Which Has More Protein?

Whey Protein Hydrolysate (WPH) vs Chicken Breast (skinless) is a genuinely useful comparison because the two differ meaningfully on more than one axis, not just total protein.

Whey Protein Hydrolysate (WPH)

85.0gprotein / 100g

380 cal · 1.5g fat · $$$$ · Quality 1.0

Chicken Breast (skinless)

31.0gprotein / 100g

165 cal · 3.6g fat · $ · Quality 0.94

Whey Protein Hydrolysate (WPH) is in a different weight class here, protein-wise: 85.0g per 100g vs Chicken Breast (skinless)'s 31.0g, a 54.0g difference that's more about food category than food quality.

Whey Protein Hydrolysate (WPH) also carries the stronger amino acid profile (highest DIAAS, pre-digested for faster absorption), while Chicken Breast (skinless) is high-DIAAS complete animal protein.

On price, Chicken Breast (skinless) wins clearly — $ against Whey Protein Hydrolysate (WPH)'s $$$$.

For anyone avoiding dairy specifically, Chicken Breast (skinless) is the clear pick over Whey Protein Hydrolysate (WPH).

Whey Protein Hydrolysate (WPH)'s typical serving also delivers more leucine (2600mg vs Chicken Breast (skinless)'s 2400mg) — relevant if the goal is maximizing the muscle-protein-synthesis trigger per meal, not just total grams.

Verdict

If raw protein density is what you're optimizing for, Whey Protein Hydrolysate (WPH) wins clearly. Choose Chicken Breast (skinless) instead if its lower fat, cost, or prep time matters more to you than the extra grams.

Full nutrition comparison

Per 100gWhey Protein Hydrolysate (WPH)Chicken Breast (skinless)
Protein85.0g31.0g
Calories380165
Fat1.5g3.6g
Carbs2.0g0.0g
Fiber0.0g0.0g
Quality score1.00.94
Relative cost$$$$$
Prep time1 min20 min

Frequently asked

Which has more protein, whey protein hydrolysate (wph) or chicken breast (skinless)?

Whey Protein Hydrolysate (WPH) has 85.0g of protein per 100g compared to Chicken Breast (skinless)'s 31.0g.

Which is lower in calories?

Chicken Breast (skinless) is lower in calories per 100g, at 165 vs the other's 380.