Venison (loin)
30.2gprotein / 100g158 cal · 3.2g fat · $$$$ · Quality 0.91
Canned Tuna (in water)
26.0gprotein / 100g116 cal · 0.8g fat · $ · Quality 0.9
There's a meaningful protein-density gap here: Venison (loin) runs 30.2g per 100g against Canned Tuna (in water)'s 26.0g, roughly 4.2g more per equal weight.
Protein quality is essentially matched between the two — both land in a similar tier for amino acid completeness.
On price, Canned Tuna (in water) wins clearly — $ against Venison (loin)'s $$$$.
Venison (loin)'s typical serving also delivers more leucine (2400mg vs Canned Tuna (in water)'s 2100mg) — relevant if the goal is maximizing the muscle-protein-synthesis trigger per meal, not just total grams.
With protein content this close, cost is the more useful tiebreaker: Canned Tuna (in water) delivers a similar protein profile to Venison (loin) at a noticeably lower price per serving.
Full nutrition comparison
| Per 100g | Venison (loin) | Canned Tuna (in water) |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 30.2g | 26.0g |
| Calories | 158 | 116 |
| Fat | 3.2g | 0.8g |
| Carbs | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Fiber | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Quality score | 0.91 | 0.9 |
| Relative cost | $$$$ | $ |
| Prep time | 15 min | 1 min |
Frequently asked
Which has more protein, venison (loin) or canned tuna (in water)?
Venison (loin) has 30.2g of protein per 100g compared to Canned Tuna (in water)'s 26.0g.
Which is lower in calories?
Canned Tuna (in water) is lower in calories per 100g, at 116 vs the other's 158.