Head-to-head comparison

Pork Tenderloin vs Ground Beef (93/7 lean): Which Has More Protein?

On paper, Pork Tenderloin and Ground Beef (93/7 lean) solve a similar problem — protein intake — but they get there differently enough to be worth a direct look.

Pork Tenderloin

26.0gprotein / 100g

143 cal · 3.5g fat · $$ · Quality 0.92

Ground Beef (93/7 lean)

22.0gprotein / 100g

152 cal · 8.0g fat · $ · Quality 0.92

Pork Tenderloin delivers a clearly higher protein density than Ground Beef (93/7 lean) — 26.0g vs 22.0g per 100g, a gap of 4.0g that adds up fast across multiple servings.

Neither has a meaningful edge on protein quality; they're close enough on amino acid profile that it isn't a differentiator here.

Ground Beef (93/7 lean) is the more budget-friendly pick ($ vs $$ for Pork Tenderloin), worth weighing if cost matters more than the other differences here.

Pork Tenderloin's typical serving also delivers more leucine (2100mg vs Ground Beef (93/7 lean)'s 1750mg) — relevant if the goal is maximizing the muscle-protein-synthesis trigger per meal, not just total grams.

Verdict

These two are closer than the comparison headline suggests. Either Pork Tenderloin or Ground Beef (93/7 lean) works well in most contexts — let cost, prep time, and personal preference decide rather than the macros.

Full nutrition comparison

Per 100gPork TenderloinGround Beef (93/7 lean)
Protein26.0g22.0g
Calories143152
Fat3.5g8.0g
Carbs0.0g0.0g
Fiber0.0g0.0g
Quality score0.920.92
Relative cost$$$
Prep time25 min10 min

Frequently asked

Which has more protein, pork tenderloin or ground beef (93/7 lean)?

Pork Tenderloin has 26.0g of protein per 100g compared to Ground Beef (93/7 lean)'s 22.0g.

Which is lower in calories?

Pork Tenderloin is lower in calories per 100g, at 143 vs the other's 152.