Head-to-head comparison

Hemp Protein Powder vs Chickpeas (cooked): Which Has More Protein?

Both Hemp Protein Powder and Chickpeas (cooked) are common enough protein choices that they get compared directly all the time — here's what the actual numbers say.

Hemp Protein Powder

50.0gprotein / 100g

380 cal · 10.0g fat · $$$ · Quality 0.5

Chickpeas (cooked)

8.9gprotein / 100g

164 cal · 2.6g fat · $ · Quality 0.65

Hemp Protein Powder is in a different weight class here, protein-wise: 50.0g per 100g vs Chickpeas (cooked)'s 8.9g, a 41.1g difference that's more about food category than food quality.

Quality flips the other way, though: Chickpeas (cooked) has the stronger amino acid profile (incomplete on its own — low in methionine, pairs well with grains) versus Hemp Protein Powder's lit_estimate, lower protein density than other powders, modest lysine.

On price, Chickpeas (cooked) wins clearly — $ against Hemp Protein Powder's $$$.

Hemp Protein Powder's typical serving also delivers more leucine (1150mg vs Chickpeas (cooked)'s 640mg) — relevant if the goal is maximizing the muscle-protein-synthesis trigger per meal, not just total grams.

Verdict

If raw protein density is what you're optimizing for, Hemp Protein Powder wins clearly. Choose Chickpeas (cooked) instead if its lower fat, cost, or prep time matters more to you than the extra grams.

Full nutrition comparison

Per 100gHemp Protein PowderChickpeas (cooked)
Protein50.0g8.9g
Calories380164
Fat10.0g2.6g
Carbs30.0g27.4g
Fiber20.0g7.6g
Quality score0.50.65
Relative cost$$$$
Prep time1 min90 min

Frequently asked

Which has more protein, hemp protein powder or chickpeas (cooked)?

Hemp Protein Powder has 50.0g of protein per 100g compared to Chickpeas (cooked)'s 8.9g.

Which is lower in calories?

Chickpeas (cooked) is lower in calories per 100g, at 164 vs the other's 380.