Canned Tuna (in water)
26.0gprotein / 100g116 cal · 0.8g fat · $ · Quality 0.9
Pork Tenderloin
26.0gprotein / 100g143 cal · 3.5g fat · $$ · Quality 0.92
Gram for gram, Canned Tuna (in water) and Pork Tenderloin are close: 26.0g vs 26.0g of protein per 100g — a difference small enough that it shouldn't be the deciding factor.
Neither has a meaningful edge on protein quality; they're close enough on amino acid profile that it isn't a differentiator here.
Canned Tuna (in water) is also the cheaper option ($ vs $$), which matters if you're eating either one regularly rather than occasionally.
These two are closer than the comparison headline suggests. Either Canned Tuna (in water) or Pork Tenderloin works well in most contexts — let cost, prep time, and personal preference decide rather than the macros.
Full nutrition comparison
| Per 100g | Canned Tuna (in water) | Pork Tenderloin |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 26.0g | 26.0g |
| Calories | 116 | 143 |
| Fat | 0.8g | 3.5g |
| Carbs | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Fiber | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Quality score | 0.9 | 0.92 |
| Relative cost | $ | $$ |
| Prep time | 1 min | 25 min |
Frequently asked
Which has more protein, canned tuna (in water) or pork tenderloin?
Canned Tuna (in water) has 26.0g of protein per 100g compared to Pork Tenderloin's 26.0g.
Which is lower in calories?
Canned Tuna (in water) is lower in calories per 100g, at 116 vs the other's 143.