Canned Tuna (in water)
26.0gprotein / 100g116 cal · 0.8g fat · $ · Quality 0.9
Lamb (leg, roasted)
25.0gprotein / 100g258 cal · 16.0g fat · $$$$ · Quality 0.91
Canned Tuna (in water) carries 1.0g more protein per 100g than Lamb (leg, roasted) (26.0g vs 25.0g) — a real but modest edge.
Neither has a meaningful edge on protein quality; they're close enough on amino acid profile that it isn't a differentiator here.
Canned Tuna (in water) is also the cheaper option ($ vs $$$$), which matters if you're eating either one regularly rather than occasionally.
With protein content this close, cost is the more useful tiebreaker: Canned Tuna (in water) delivers a similar protein profile to Lamb (leg, roasted) at a noticeably lower price per serving.
Full nutrition comparison
| Per 100g | Canned Tuna (in water) | Lamb (leg, roasted) |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 26.0g | 25.0g |
| Calories | 116 | 258 |
| Fat | 0.8g | 16.0g |
| Carbs | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Fiber | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Quality score | 0.9 | 0.91 |
| Relative cost | $ | $$$$ |
| Prep time | 1 min | 90 min |
Frequently asked
Which has more protein, canned tuna (in water) or lamb (leg, roasted)?
Canned Tuna (in water) has 26.0g of protein per 100g compared to Lamb (leg, roasted)'s 25.0g.
Which is lower in calories?
Canned Tuna (in water) is lower in calories per 100g, at 116 vs the other's 258.