Canned Tuna (in water)
26.0gprotein / 100g116 cal · 0.8g fat · $ · Quality 0.9
Chicken Thigh (skinless)
26.0gprotein / 100g209 cal · 10.9g fat · $ · Quality 0.92
Gram for gram, Canned Tuna (in water) and Chicken Thigh (skinless) are close: 26.0g vs 26.0g of protein per 100g — a difference small enough that it shouldn't be the deciding factor.
Neither has a meaningful edge on protein quality; they're close enough on amino acid profile that it isn't a differentiator here.
Cost is roughly comparable between the two ($), so budget isn't the deciding factor here.
These two are closer than the comparison headline suggests. Either Canned Tuna (in water) or Chicken Thigh (skinless) works well in most contexts — let cost, prep time, and personal preference decide rather than the macros.
Full nutrition comparison
| Per 100g | Canned Tuna (in water) | Chicken Thigh (skinless) |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 26.0g | 26.0g |
| Calories | 116 | 209 |
| Fat | 0.8g | 10.9g |
| Carbs | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Fiber | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Quality score | 0.9 | 0.92 |
| Relative cost | $ | $ |
| Prep time | 1 min | 25 min |
Frequently asked
Which has more protein, canned tuna (in water) or chicken thigh (skinless)?
Canned Tuna (in water) has 26.0g of protein per 100g compared to Chicken Thigh (skinless)'s 26.0g.
Which is lower in calories?
Canned Tuna (in water) is lower in calories per 100g, at 116 vs the other's 209.