Bison (ground)
28.0gprotein / 100g146 cal · 2.4g fat · $$$$ · Quality 0.92
Pork Chop (bone-in)
27.0gprotein / 100g231 cal · 14.0g fat · $$ · Quality 0.9
Per 100g, Bison (ground) comes in at 28.0g of protein against Pork Chop (bone-in)'s 27.0g, a 1.0g gap that's noticeable across a full day's eating but won't make or break either choice on its own.
Protein quality is essentially matched between the two — both land in a similar tier for amino acid completeness.
On price, Pork Chop (bone-in) wins clearly — $$ against Bison (ground)'s $$$$.
With protein content this close, cost is the more useful tiebreaker: Pork Chop (bone-in) delivers a similar protein profile to Bison (ground) at a noticeably lower price per serving.
Full nutrition comparison
| Per 100g | Bison (ground) | Pork Chop (bone-in) |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 28.0g | 27.0g |
| Calories | 146 | 231 |
| Fat | 2.4g | 14.0g |
| Carbs | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Fiber | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Quality score | 0.92 | 0.9 |
| Relative cost | $$$$ | $$ |
| Prep time | 10 min | 15 min |
Frequently asked
Which has more protein, bison (ground) or pork chop (bone-in)?
Bison (ground) has 28.0g of protein per 100g compared to Pork Chop (bone-in)'s 27.0g.
Which is lower in calories?
Bison (ground) is lower in calories per 100g, at 146 vs the other's 231.