Bison (ground)
28.0gprotein / 100g146 cal · 2.4g fat · $$$$ · Quality 0.92
Lamb (leg, roasted)
25.0gprotein / 100g258 cal · 16.0g fat · $$$$ · Quality 0.91
Per 100g, Bison (ground) comes in at 28.0g of protein against Lamb (leg, roasted)'s 25.0g, a 3.0g gap that's noticeable across a full day's eating but won't make or break either choice on its own.
Protein quality is essentially matched between the two — both land in a similar tier for amino acid completeness.
Cost is roughly comparable between the two ($$$$), so budget isn't the deciding factor here.
Bison (ground)'s typical serving also delivers more leucine (2250mg vs Lamb (leg, roasted)'s 1980mg) — relevant if the goal is maximizing the muscle-protein-synthesis trigger per meal, not just total grams.
These two are closer than the comparison headline suggests. Either Bison (ground) or Lamb (leg, roasted) works well in most contexts — let cost, prep time, and personal preference decide rather than the macros.
Full nutrition comparison
| Per 100g | Bison (ground) | Lamb (leg, roasted) |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 28.0g | 25.0g |
| Calories | 146 | 258 |
| Fat | 2.4g | 16.0g |
| Carbs | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Fiber | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Quality score | 0.92 | 0.91 |
| Relative cost | $$$$ | $$$$ |
| Prep time | 10 min | 90 min |
Frequently asked
Which has more protein, bison (ground) or lamb (leg, roasted)?
Bison (ground) has 28.0g of protein per 100g compared to Lamb (leg, roasted)'s 25.0g.
Which is lower in calories?
Bison (ground) is lower in calories per 100g, at 146 vs the other's 258.