Head-to-head comparison

Bison (ground) vs Edamame (shelled, cooked): Which Has More Protein?

Bison (ground) vs Edamame (shelled, cooked) is a genuinely useful comparison because the two differ meaningfully on more than one axis, not just total protein.

Bison (ground)

28.0gprotein / 100g

146 cal · 2.4g fat · $$$$ · Quality 0.92

Edamame (shelled, cooked)

11.2gprotein / 100g

121 cal · 5.2g fat · $$ · Quality 0.85

Bison (ground) is in a different weight class here, protein-wise: 28.0g per 100g vs Edamame (shelled, cooked)'s 11.2g, a 16.8g difference that's more about food category than food quality.

Bison (ground) also carries the stronger amino acid profile (lit_estimate, complete animal protein), while Edamame (shelled, cooked) is DIAAS-adjusted, complete plant protein.

On price, Edamame (shelled, cooked) wins clearly — $$ against Bison (ground)'s $$$$.

The dietary-restriction question settles this for a lot of people before the macros even matter: Edamame (shelled, cooked) is vegan, Bison (ground) isn't.

Bison (ground)'s typical serving also delivers more leucine (2250mg vs Edamame (shelled, cooked)'s 900mg) — relevant if the goal is maximizing the muscle-protein-synthesis trigger per meal, not just total grams.

Verdict

The real deciding factor is dietary fit, not macros: choose Edamame (shelled, cooked) if you need it to be plant-based, choose Bison (ground) otherwise — the protein numbers are close enough that diet compatibility should lead.

Full nutrition comparison

Per 100gBison (ground)Edamame (shelled, cooked)
Protein28.0g11.2g
Calories146121
Fat2.4g5.2g
Carbs0.0g8.9g
Fiber0.0g5.2g
Quality score0.920.85
Relative cost$$$$$$
Prep time10 min6 min

Frequently asked

Which has more protein, bison (ground) or edamame (shelled, cooked)?

Bison (ground) has 28.0g of protein per 100g compared to Edamame (shelled, cooked)'s 11.2g.

Which is lower in calories?

Edamame (shelled, cooked) is lower in calories per 100g, at 121 vs the other's 146.