Head-to-head comparison

Almonds (raw) vs Chickpeas (cooked): Which Has More Protein?

Both Almonds (raw) and Chickpeas (cooked) are common enough protein choices that they get compared directly all the time — here's what the actual numbers say.

Almonds (raw)

21.2gprotein / 100g

579 cal · 49.9g fat · $$ · Quality 0.4

Chickpeas (cooked)

8.9gprotein / 100g

164 cal · 2.6g fat · $ · Quality 0.65

Almonds (raw) is in a different weight class here, protein-wise: 21.2g per 100g vs Chickpeas (cooked)'s 8.9g, a 12.3g difference that's more about food category than food quality.

Quality flips the other way, though: Chickpeas (cooked) has the stronger amino acid profile (incomplete on its own — low in methionine, pairs well with grains) versus Almonds (raw)'s lit_estimate, low in lysine.

On price, Chickpeas (cooked) wins clearly — $ against Almonds (raw)'s $$.

Almonds (raw)'s typical serving also delivers more leucine (1450mg vs Chickpeas (cooked)'s 640mg) — relevant if the goal is maximizing the muscle-protein-synthesis trigger per meal, not just total grams.

Verdict

If raw protein density is what you're optimizing for, Almonds (raw) wins clearly. Choose Chickpeas (cooked) instead if its lower fat, cost, or prep time matters more to you than the extra grams.

Full nutrition comparison

Per 100gAlmonds (raw)Chickpeas (cooked)
Protein21.2g8.9g
Calories579164
Fat49.9g2.6g
Carbs21.6g27.4g
Fiber12.5g7.6g
Quality score0.40.65
Relative cost$$$
Prep time0 min90 min

Frequently asked

Which has more protein, almonds (raw) or chickpeas (cooked)?

Almonds (raw) has 21.2g of protein per 100g compared to Chickpeas (cooked)'s 8.9g.

Which is lower in calories?

Chickpeas (cooked) is lower in calories per 100g, at 164 vs the other's 579.